Hide menu

TDDD50 Green Computing

Examination


 

General examination rules

The examination of the course is based on three different activities carried out in the context of the seminars. The incremental requirements for the different grades are:

Grade 3

  • Attend all seminar sessions and participate in all the discussions
  • Satisfactory presentation and satisfactory leading of discussion at the seminar where the assigned paper is presented by the student
  • Write a report about the paper assigned following the report guidelines and using the provided template

How to interpret "satisfactory" above will be demonstrated in seminar 0, attendance of which is compulsory.

Grade 4

  • High quality form and content in the report
  • Prepared activity in the seminar discussion

Grade 5

Extended report, including the following points:
  • Proposal of alternative ideas on the paper solution
  • Extended related work with at least one more reference

Special cases

  • Many learning goals are reached in the seminars and discussions, hence the attendance of seminars is compulsary. You should contact your teacher at least one day before in case of justified reason to skip a session but you need to compensate for it later. Missing a seminar (including seminar 0) results in a requirement of summarising the papers presented in that seminar (one page, satisfactory content).
  • Low activity in discussions will result in feedback by the teacher after the session and the student will be encouraged to be more active, followed by closer monitoring in next seminars.
  • Low quality presentation or leadership results in a retake session that will be separately arranged by the teachers.

Deadlines for the report

The first version of the written report (and where applicable the compensation reports) is recommended to be electronically handed in one week after the presentation seminar. First attempt at the report must have been handed in before the 26th March.

First version

The report is sent by e-mail to one of the following addresses

  • Group A: simna73.liu(at-sign)analys.urkund.se
  • Group B: ekhve37.liu(at-sign)analys.urkund.se
  • Group C: marva19.liu(at-sign)analys.urkund.se
  • Group D: simna73.liu(at-sign)analys.urkund.se
  • Group E: ekhve37.liu(at-sign)analys.urkund.se
Within two weeks the teacher sents it back with feedback for correction or improvement.

Revised version

The student corrects the report with the feedback received. Within one week she/he hands in a revised version to the same Urkund e-mail address. Then the report is reviewed again and the final grade for the course is given.

Attention: All the documents sent are automatically analysed for plagiarism by the Urkund service.

Retake period

If the report was not delivered on time, or if it was not up to the required standards, it can be handed in again during the retake period.

The next retake dates will be between 9-12th June and 18-30th August. The report can be handed in before these dates, but we cannot assure that it will be corrected before.

Note: Unless the report was never handed in before the March deadline, a retake will proceed to a grade after a single review with no further revision.

Page responsible: Ekhiotz Jon Vergara
Last updated: 2014-01-24