The ENRAC Newsletter of 16.3 contained the first referee report for Michael Thielscher's submitted reference article about the Fluent Calculus. Today's Newsletter contains Thielscher's answer and the report of the second referee, who in fact disagrees strongly with the first one.

Naturally, referee 1 will have a possibility of responding before the accept/decline decision is made.

Referee number 2 also raises some policy issues about how such situations ought to be treated, and the area editor answers with his view on this topic.

Several additional referee reports have been received lately, and in particular while the present editor travelled to the AAAI Spring Symposium at Stanford. Because of the time required for editing, these reports will appear in forthcoming newsletters during the next few days.

Additional debate contributions have been received for the following article(s). Please click the title of the article to link to the interaction page, containing both new and old contributions to the discussion.

Michael Thielscher
Introduction to the Fluent Calculus
   Review protocol: [in this pane]; with links: [frame] [noframe]