[25 May 2015] A master student at RTSLAB was awarded the best thesis
award from IDA - Klervie Toczé. more ...
[26 May 2014] A bachelor student at RTSLAB was awarded the best thesis
award from IDA - Simon Andersson. more ...
[31 May 2012] A masters student at RTSLAB was awarded the best thesis
award from IDA - Ulf Magnusson. more ...
[27 February 2008] A masters student at RTSLAB was awarded the best thesis
award from IDA - Johan Sigholm. more ...
[03 March 2004] A masters student at RTSLAB was awarded the best thesis
award from IDA - Tobias Chyssler. more ...
[01 Jul 2003] For second year in a row a masters student at RTSLAB was awarded the best thesis
award from SNART - Mehdi Amirijoo. more ...
Master Thesis - Past Projects - Abstract
Analysis of Intent Specification and System Upgrade Traceability
The impact of computer programs in safety-critical systems has increased in the past decades and computer-based systems can now be found in a wide range of applications.
A new approach for developing dependable systems is documenting all design rationale that affects safety using Intent Specifications. A recent approach for developing complex systems efficiently and in an upgradeable manner is Component-Based System Engineering. In this thesis, these approaches are combined in the development and upgrade of a Remote Robot Control Unit by using the tool SpecTRM.
The case study showed that Intent Specifications and CBSE could successfully be combined. The tool SpecTRM was also studied during this work. It showed that traceability is of great importance during system upgrades. Since SpecTRM does not support formal verification of safety properties in design models, the SpecTRM-RL models were translated to Esterel code. Further analysis showed that functional verification can be efficient and useful when using the automatic model-checking tool available in Esterel Studio. This work also proposes a practical guideline for system upgrades in component-based systems, presented as the Sigma model.
The work also showed some shortcomings. First of all, the tool SpecTRM is at an early development stage and not yet mature for industrial use. Secondly, neither of the two languages SpecTRM-RL and Esterel was expressive enough for some of the numerical computations and data-exchange structures needed in the system. Finally, the verifier was not able to prove any data properties since valued signals are abstracted into pure signals during verification in Esterel Studio.
Keywords: Intent Specification, SpecTRM, Upgrades, Traceability, Verification, Component-Based Systems Engineering
Author(s): Jonas Elmqvist
Contact: Simin Nadjm-Tehrani
Click here to return.