Anders Bengtsson Folk cures for malaria in Carelia and western Finland. Acta Historica Fennica, Vol. 66 (1991), pp. 68-92.

1997-1   [original]

[msg to moderator] [debate procedure] [copyright]

Q1. Jan Ersa:

Your analysis is not very precise. It would be necessary to stratify the available data with respect to landscape (dry vs wet areas), the living standard of the population, and the exposure to migrants. It would be necessary to stratify the available data with respect to landscape (dry vs wet areas), the living standard of the population, and the exposure to migrants.

It would be necessary to stratify the available data with respect to landscape (dry vs wet areas), the living standard of the population, and the exposure to migrants. It would be necessary to stratify the available data with respect to landscape (dry vs wet areas), the living standard of the population, and the exposure to migrants. It would be necessary to stratify the available data with respect to landscape (dry vs wet areas), the living standard of the population, and the exposure to migrants. It would be necessary to stratify the available data with respect to landscape (dry vs wet areas), the living standard of the population, and the exposure to migrants.

It would be necessary to stratify the available data with respect to landscape (dry vs wet areas), the living standard of the population, and the exposure to migrants. It would be necessary to stratify the available data with respect to landscape (dry vs wet areas), the living standard of the population, and the exposure to migrants.

A1. Per Persa:

My analysis is very precise. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account.

All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account.

All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account.

All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account. All the aspects that you mention have been taken into account.

C1-1. Gustaf Fröding:

You guys are both wrong. The approach that both of you assume is completely irrelevant for the problem at hand. What is more, that problem is also entirely irrelevant for everything else besides itself. The approach that both of you assume is completely irrelevant for the problem at hand. What is more, that problem is also entirely irrelevant for everything else besides itself.

The approach that both of you assume is completely irrelevant for the problem at hand. What is more, that problem is also entirely irrelevant for everything else besides itself. The approach that both of you assume is completely irrelevant for the problem at hand. What is more, that problem is also entirely irrelevant for everything else besides itself. The approach that both of you assume is completely irrelevant for the problem at hand. What is more, that problem is also entirely irrelevant for everything else besides itself.

The approach that both of you assume is completely irrelevant for the problem at hand. What is more, that problem is also entirely irrelevant for everything else besides itself.