Frans Voorbraak A Nonmonotonic Observation Logic.

c-fcs-98-166   [original] [abstract]

[mail to author]   [mail to moderator] [debate procedure] [copyright]

Q1. A workshop participant:

You propose using default logic as the basis of your approach, but then you do not seem to make any concrete use of it. Why do you need it at all?

A1. Frans Voorbraak:

It is not used in a concrete way now, but it will in the forthcoming extensions where we allow for defeasible background knowledge as well as defeasible observations.

This on-line debate page is part of a discussion at recent workshop; similar pages are set up for each of the workshop articles. The discussion is organized by the area Reasoning about Actions and Change within the Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (ETAI).

To contribute, please click [mail to moderator] above and send your question or comment as an E-mail message.