ETAI NJ Actions and Change

News Journal on Reasoning about Actions and Change


Vol. 1, Nr. 3 Editor: Erik Sandewall 31.10, 1997

The ETAI is organized and published under the auspices of the
European Coordinating Committee for Artificial Intelligence (ECCAI).

Contents of this digest issue


ETAI Publications

Received research articles

The following article has been received by the present ETAI area, which means that it will be open for a three-month discussion period, followed by the closed peer-review decision on whether it will be accepted by the ETAI. All readers of this Newsletter are invited to participate in the discussion.

Please don't be shy to ask questions; it is actually in the author's interest to receive tough questions. Just like at an internal seminar, they give him or her a chance to show that he/she is able to answer well, and they give valuable feedback. Also, since the article has already been published (but not yet refereed), it is citable from now on, so tough questions do not deprive the author of being "on record" with the article.

Clicking the title of the article leads to the official cover page where it was published, with links e.g. to its full text. Clicking "[interactions]" leads to the on-going question-answer debate about the article, with options for submitting a question or comment to the present Newsletter editor.

Michael Thielscher
A Theory of Dynamic Diagnosis.
[summary]
[interactions]

Antonis Kakas and Rob Miller
Reasoning about Actions, Narratives and Ramification.
[summary]
[interactions]

Received research notes

Paolo Liberatore
Compilability of Domain Descriptions in the Language A.
[interactions]

Discussion about received articles

There have been contributions to the discussions about the following research articles. Please refer to their respective interaction pages to review the discussion.

Antonis Kakas
Reasoning about Actions, Narratives and Ramification


Debates

NRAC Panel Discussion on Ontologies for Actions and Change

There have be en 12 contributions to this discussion during the present month. Please click here to see the full discussion protocol

NRAC Panel Discussion on Theory Evaluation

There have be en 7 contributions to this discussion during the present month. Please click here to see the full discussion protocol


Edited by Erik Sandewall, Linköping University, Sweden. E-mail ejs@ida.liu.se.